Logical Reasoning
Statements and conclusions, syllogisms, blood relations.
Syllogisms
All-some-no statements; Venn diagram method.
LOGICAL REASONING assesses one's ability to reason through verbal/non-verbal puzzles.
Common in: SSC, IBPS, CAT, GATE, UPSC, placements.
TOPICS COVERED:
- Series (covered Pack 16).
- Analogy (covered Pack 17 — aptitude-logical).
- Classification.
- Coding-decoding (covered Pack 14).
- Direction sense (covered Pack 14).
- Blood relations.
- Seating arrangement (covered Pack 12).
- Syllogisms (covered Pack 12).
- Puzzles (covered Pack 17).
- Statement assumption / conclusion.
- Course of action.
- Cause-effect.
- Venn diagrams (logical).
- Data sufficiency (covered Pack 16).
- Pattern matching, mathematical.
KEY STRATEGIES:
A. Quick scan, then deep dive.
For series, analogy, classification: quick scan for pattern; if unclear, try alternate patterns.
B. Visualize.
Draw — seating, family tree, Venn diagram, direction map.
C. Use options.
For multiple-choice, work backward from options if direct deduction is slow.
D. Eliminate.
Cross out wrong options; reduce to 2 then pick.
TYPES OF QUESTIONS — DEEP DIVE:
1. Analogy:
A : B :: C : ?
Relation types:
- Synonym/Antonym.
- Action-object: doctor-patient, lawyer-client.
- Part-whole: leaf-tree, branch-river.
- Worker-tool: carpenter-saw.
- Cause-effect: study-knowledge.
- Number patterns: 2:8 :: 3:27 (cubes).
2. Classification (odd-one-out):
Given 4-5 items; find the one that doesn't fit.
Approach: identify the common property; spot exception.
Examples:
- Mango, Apple, Carrot, Banana → Carrot (vegetable).
- 25, 36, 49, 64, 81 → all squares (no exception).
3. Mathematical operations:
Decode operators in non-standard symbols.
Example: "If + means ×, − means ÷, × means +, ÷ means −. Find 12 × 4 + 3 − 2 ÷ 1."
- Decode: × becomes +, + becomes ×, − becomes ÷, ÷ becomes −.
- So: 12 + 4 × 3 ÷ 2 − 1 = 12 + 12/2 − 1 = 12 + 6 − 1 = 17.
4. Statement & Argument:
Statement: "Smoking should be banned in public places."
Argument I: "Yes, it causes harm to non-smokers." → Strong; supports.
Argument II: "No, individual freedom matters." → Weak; addresses individual not direct harm.
Determine which argument is STRONG.
5. Logical Venn:
3 categories (e.g., doctors, women, sportsmen):
- Draw 3 overlapping circles.
- Find areas (only doctors, doctor+women, all three, etc.).
6. Course of action:
Statement: "Crime rate in city X has risen."
Course I: Police should patrol more. → Strong; addresses.
Course II: Ban citizens from streets. → Drastic; not feasible.
Identify which is correct/feasible.
ADVANCED — Mathematical reasoning:
Q1. If 1 + 1 = 0, 2 + 2 = 4, 3 + 3 = 24, what is 4 + 4?
Pattern: n + n = n × (n − 1) × 2? Check:
- 1×0×2 = 0. ✓
- 2×1×2 = 4. ✓
- 3×2×2 = 12. But given 24. So different.
- Try: n × n × 2? 1, 4, 18, 32. No.
- Try cube: 1, 8, 27, 64. No.
Hmm, let me try: 1+1 = 0 (= 1−1?); 2+2 = 4 (= 2×2?); 3+3 = 24 (= 3×4×2? or 6×4?). Pattern: 6 + 18 = 24? Sum to next? It's unclear without more data — could be a made-up answer pattern in the original.
(Such questions test pattern detection — try multiple hypotheses.)
STRATEGY FOR EXAM:
Time: 30-60 sec / question for easy types; 1-3 min for puzzles.
Order:
- Series, analogy (fast).
- Classification (medium).
- Coding-decoding, direction (medium).
- Blood relations, seating (medium-hard).
- Puzzles (hard).
- Statement/conclusion (medium-hard).
Skip puzzles in time-pressured exam; do them last.
EXAM HOOKS:
- Series: differences, ratios, squares, primes.
- Analogy: relation type identification.
- Classification: find common; spot exception.
- Puzzles: tables.
- Statement-conclusion: verify each conclusion is forced.
- Cause-effect: distinguish independent events.
Blood relations
Family tree drawing technique.
LOGICAL REASONING assesses one's ability to reason through verbal/non-verbal puzzles.
Common in: SSC, IBPS, CAT, GATE, UPSC, placements.
TOPICS COVERED:
- Series (covered Pack 16).
- Analogy (covered Pack 17 — aptitude-logical).
- Classification.
- Coding-decoding (covered Pack 14).
- Direction sense (covered Pack 14).
- Blood relations.
- Seating arrangement (covered Pack 12).
- Syllogisms (covered Pack 12).
- Puzzles (covered Pack 17).
- Statement assumption / conclusion.
- Course of action.
- Cause-effect.
- Venn diagrams (logical).
- Data sufficiency (covered Pack 16).
- Pattern matching, mathematical.
KEY STRATEGIES:
A. Quick scan, then deep dive.
For series, analogy, classification: quick scan for pattern; if unclear, try alternate patterns.
B. Visualize.
Draw — seating, family tree, Venn diagram, direction map.
C. Use options.
For multiple-choice, work backward from options if direct deduction is slow.
D. Eliminate.
Cross out wrong options; reduce to 2 then pick.
TYPES OF QUESTIONS — DEEP DIVE:
1. Analogy:
A : B :: C : ?
Relation types:
- Synonym/Antonym.
- Action-object: doctor-patient, lawyer-client.
- Part-whole: leaf-tree, branch-river.
- Worker-tool: carpenter-saw.
- Cause-effect: study-knowledge.
- Number patterns: 2:8 :: 3:27 (cubes).
2. Classification (odd-one-out):
Given 4-5 items; find the one that doesn't fit.
Approach: identify the common property; spot exception.
Examples:
- Mango, Apple, Carrot, Banana → Carrot (vegetable).
- 25, 36, 49, 64, 81 → all squares (no exception).
3. Mathematical operations:
Decode operators in non-standard symbols.
Example: "If + means ×, − means ÷, × means +, ÷ means −. Find 12 × 4 + 3 − 2 ÷ 1."
- Decode: × becomes +, + becomes ×, − becomes ÷, ÷ becomes −.
- So: 12 + 4 × 3 ÷ 2 − 1 = 12 + 12/2 − 1 = 12 + 6 − 1 = 17.
4. Statement & Argument:
Statement: "Smoking should be banned in public places."
Argument I: "Yes, it causes harm to non-smokers." → Strong; supports.
Argument II: "No, individual freedom matters." → Weak; addresses individual not direct harm.
Determine which argument is STRONG.
5. Logical Venn:
3 categories (e.g., doctors, women, sportsmen):
- Draw 3 overlapping circles.
- Find areas (only doctors, doctor+women, all three, etc.).
6. Course of action:
Statement: "Crime rate in city X has risen."
Course I: Police should patrol more. → Strong; addresses.
Course II: Ban citizens from streets. → Drastic; not feasible.
Identify which is correct/feasible.
ADVANCED — Mathematical reasoning:
Q1. If 1 + 1 = 0, 2 + 2 = 4, 3 + 3 = 24, what is 4 + 4?
Pattern: n + n = n × (n − 1) × 2? Check:
- 1×0×2 = 0. ✓
- 2×1×2 = 4. ✓
- 3×2×2 = 12. But given 24. So different.
- Try: n × n × 2? 1, 4, 18, 32. No.
- Try cube: 1, 8, 27, 64. No.
Hmm, let me try: 1+1 = 0 (= 1−1?); 2+2 = 4 (= 2×2?); 3+3 = 24 (= 3×4×2? or 6×4?). Pattern: 6 + 18 = 24? Sum to next? It's unclear without more data — could be a made-up answer pattern in the original.
(Such questions test pattern detection — try multiple hypotheses.)
STRATEGY FOR EXAM:
Time: 30-60 sec / question for easy types; 1-3 min for puzzles.
Order:
- Series, analogy (fast).
- Classification (medium).
- Coding-decoding, direction (medium).
- Blood relations, seating (medium-hard).
- Puzzles (hard).
- Statement/conclusion (medium-hard).
Skip puzzles in time-pressured exam; do them last.
EXAM HOOKS:
- Series: differences, ratios, squares, primes.
- Analogy: relation type identification.
- Classification: find common; spot exception.
- Puzzles: tables.
- Statement-conclusion: verify each conclusion is forced.
- Cause-effect: distinguish independent events.